maturity / assessment / agile
Agile Maturity Radar
An evidence-led radar, current and target scores, and a gap-ordered improvement plan.
Purpose
Build an evidence-led picture of working practices and choose the next useful improvement. Compare against an agreed baseline, not an invented industry league table.
When to use
- Teams want a shared improvement baseline.
- A change programme needs evidence of capability development.
What you get
- Maturity dimensions with evidence scoring criteria.
- A radar review structure and baseline comparison guide.
How to use Agile Maturity Radar
Quick start
- 1Score dimensions with evidence, not aspiration.
- 2View the radar.
- 3Take the largest evidence-backed gap as the only improvement theme for 30 days.
What good looks like
Every score cites an artefact or observed behaviour, the plan is gap-ordered, and there is no level-4 vanity without proof.
Common mistakes
- Scoring for a sponsor audience.
- Benchmarking to an invented industry league table.
- Ten improvement themes at once.
Capability profile
Scale 1 to 5
- 01CI/CD & Automation
- 02Code Quality
- 03Iterative Planning
- 04Flow & WIP
- 05Psychological Safety
- 06Continuous Learning
- 07Servant Leadership
- 08Strategic Alignment
Monday action: Pick one dimension; write the evidence you already have and the evidence you lack.
Interactive workspace
Open tools / your team's contextLocal workspace
Agile maturity workspace
Editable local examples, not industry benchmarks.
Loading local workspace
- Current average
- 2.5 / 5
- Below target
- 8
- Evidence recorded
- 8
Capability profile
Scale 1 to 5
- 01CI/CD & Automation
- 02Code Quality
- 03Iterative Planning
- 04Flow & WIP
- 05Psychological Safety
- 06Continuous Learning
- 07Servant Leadership
- 08Strategic Alignment
Improvement plan, largest gaps first
Code Quality
2 → 4Agree a short review checklist and test it on the next change.
Flow & WIP
2 → 4Set a WIP limit and agree a backup reviewer.
Continuous Learning
2 → 4Review the previous retrospective action before starting a new one.
Strategic Alignment
2 → 4Link the next three changes to the reliability objective.
CI/CD & Automation
3 → 4Add a failed-payment scenario to the deployment checks.
Iterative Planning
3 → 4Bring one customer outcome into the planning conversation.
Psychological Safety
3 → 4Ask for dissenting views before agreeing a release decision.
Servant Leadership
3 → 4Choose one recurring dependency to remove this month.
Apply this with a practitioner
Free to use and adapt with attribution to Momentup Consulting under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Read the licence.